CoronaVirus/Pfizer

© Shutterstock, screenshot/Pfizer/KJN

Vaccine makers have nothing to lose by marketing their experimental COVID-nineteen shots, fifty-fifty if they cause serious injury and death, as they enjoy full indemnity against injuries occurring from COVID-19 vaccines or any other pandemic vaccine under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act, passed in the U.S. in 2005.

The full extent of their COVID-19 vaccine indemnification agreements with countries, however, is a closely guarded secret, one that has remained highly confidential — until now. A leaked document broken downward by Twitter user Ehden reveals the shocking terms of Pfizer'south international COVID-nineteen vaccine agreements. He wrote:

"These agreements are confidential, but luckily one country did not protect the contract document well plenty, so I managed to get a hold of a re-create. As you are almost to see, in that location is a adept reason why Pfizer was fighting to hide the details of these contracts."

An ironclad agreement, all on Pfizer's terms

The alleged indemnification agreement, reportedly between Pfizer and Albania, was originally posted in snippets on Twitter, merely Twitter now has them marked as "unavailable." Copies of the tweets are available on Treadreader, however.

The Albania agreement appears very similar to another contract, published online, between Pfizer and the Dominican Republic. It covers not only COVID-19 vaccines, but any product that enhances the apply or effects of such vaccines. Countries that purchase Pfizer's COVID-19 shot must admit that "Pfizer's efforts to develop and manufacture the Product" are "subject to significant risks and uncertainties."

And in the event that a drug or other handling comes out that tin forestall, treat or cure COVID-19, the agreement stands, and the country must follow through with their lodge. Ivermectin , for instance, is non only condom, inexpensive and widely bachelor but has been found to reduce COVID-19 mort ality by 81% . All the same, it continues to exist ignored in favor of more expensive, and less effective, treatments and mass experimental vaccination. Ehden wrote:

"If yous were wondering why #Ivermectin was suppressed, well, information technology is because the agreement that countries had with Pfizer does not allow them to escape their contract, which states that even if a drug volition be found to treat COVID19 the contract cannot exist voided."

Even if Pfizer fails to deliver vaccine doses inside their estimated delivery catamenia, the purchaser may not cancel the order. Further, Pfizer tin can make adjustments to the number of contracted doses and their delivery schedule, "based on principles to exist adamant by Pfizer," and the country buying the vaccines must "concord to any revision."

Information technology doesn't matter if the vaccines are delivered severely belatedly, even at a bespeak when they're no longer needed, as information technology's made articulate that

"Nether no circumstances will Pfizer exist subject field to or liable for whatever tardily delivery penalties." Equally y'all might suspect, the contract also "forbids returns under whatsoever circumstances."

The big secret: Pfizer charged U.S. More than Than Other Countries

While COVID-19 vaccines are "costless" to receive in the U.South., they're being paid for by taxpayer dollars at a charge per unit of $xix.5011 per dose. Republic of albania, the leaked contract revealed, paid $12 per dose, while the EU paid $14.70 per shot. While charging unlike prices to different purchases is common in the drug industry, it's often frowned upon.

In the case of the price disparity betwixt the U.S. and the Eu, Pfizer is said to have given a toll break to the EU because it financially supported the development of their COVID-19 vaccine. Still, Ehden noted, "U.S. taxpayers got screwed past Pfizer, probably also Israel." Also, Pfizer makes a point to annotation that countries have no right to withhold payment to the visitor for whatever reason.

Apparently, this includes in the case of receiving damaged goods. Purchasers of Pfizer'southward COVID-19 vaccines are not entitled to reject them "based on service complaints," unless they do not suit to specifications or the FDA's Electric current Good Manufacturing Practice regulations. And, Ehden adds, "This understanding is above any local law of the country."

While the purchaser has virtually no way of canceling the contract, Pfizer tin can cease the agreement in the outcome of a "material breach" of any term in their contract.

Safety and efficacy 'not currently known'

The purchaser of Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine must also acknowledge two facts that have largely been brushed under the rug: Both their efficacy and risks are unknown. According to section 5.5 of the contract:

"Purchaser acknowledges that the Vaccine and materials related to the Vaccine, and their components and constituent materials are being rapidly developed due to the emergency circumstances of the COVID-19 pandemic and will continue to be studied after provision of the Vaccine to Purchaser nether this Agreement.

"Purchaser further acknowledges that the long-term furnishings and efficacy of the Vaccine are non currently known and that there may exist adverse furnishings of the Vaccine that are not currently known."

Indemnification by the purchaser is likewise explicitly required by the contract, which states, under section eight.i:

"Purchaser hereby agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Pfizer, BioNTech, each of their Affiliates, contractors, sub-contractors, licensors, licensees, sub-licensees, distributors, contract manufacturers, services providers, clinical trial researchers, third parties to whom Pfizer or BioNTech or whatsoever of their corresponding Affiliates may directly or indirectly owe an indemnity based on the research ...
"from and against whatever and all suits, claims, actions, demands, losses, amercement, liabilities, settlements, penalties, fines, costs and expenses (including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys' fees and other expenses of an investigation or litigation ... arising out of, relating to, or resulting from the Vaccine ..."

Meanwhile, the purchaser must also keep the terms of the contract confidential for a flow of 10 years.

Not only does Pfizer have total indemnification, but there'south also a section in the contract titled, "Assumption of Defense by Purchaser," which states that in the issue Pfizer suffers losses for which it is seeking indemnification, the purchaser

"shall promptly assume conduct and control of the defense of such Indemnified Claims on behalf of the Indemnitee with counsel acceptable to Indemnitee(s), whether or non the Indemnified Claim is rightfully brought."

Ehden notes:

"Pfizer is making sure the state will pay for everything: 'Costs and expenses, including ... fees and disbursements of counsel, incurred past the Indemnitee(due south) in connection with whatsoever Indemnified Claim shall be reimbursed on a quarterly basis by Purchaser.'"

Cached in the March 17, 2020, Federal Annals — the daily journal of the U.Southward. government — in a document titled, "Declaration Nether the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act for Medical Countermeasures Against COVID-19," is language that establishes a new COVID-19 vaccine court — similar to the federal vaccine court that already exists.

In the U.Due south., vaccine makers already enjoy full indemnity against injuries occurring from this or any other pandemic vaccine nether the PREP Act. If yous're injured by a COVID vaccine (or a select group of other vaccines designated under the act), you'd take to file a compensation claim with the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP), which is funded past U.South. taxpayers via Congressional appropriation to the Department of Wellness and Human being Services (DHHS).

While similar to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Programme (NVICP), which applies to nonpandemic vaccines, the CICP is even less generous when it comes to bounty. As reported by Dr. Meryl Nass, the maximum payout yous can receive — even in cases of permanent disability or expiry — is $250,000 per person; however, you'd have to exhaust your private insurance policy before the CICP gives you a dime.

The CICP too has a one-year statute of limitations, so you lot have to human activity chop-chop, which is also difficult since information technology's unknown if long-term effects could occur more than a year afterwards.

Pfizer accused of abuse of ability

Equally is apparent in Pfizer's confidential contract with Republic of albania, the drug giant wants governments to guarantee the company volition be compensated for any expenses resulting from injury lawsuits against it. Pfizer has also demanded that countries put up sovereign assets , including depository financial institution reserves, armed forces bases and embassy buildings, as collateral for expected vaccine injury lawsuits resulting from its COVID-xix inoculation.

New Delhi-based World Is One News (WION) reported in February 2021 that Brazil rejected Pfizer'due south demands, calling them "abusive." The demands included that Brazil:

  1. "Waives sovereignty of its avails abroad in favor of Pfizer."
  2. Not apply its domestic laws to the company.
  3. Not penalize Pfizer for vaccine delivery delays.
  4. Exempt Pfizer from all ceremonious liability for side furnishings.

STAT News likewise referred to concerns by legal experts, who also suggested Pfizer'due south demands were an abuse of ability. Mark Eccleston-Turner, a lecturer in global health police force at Keele University in England, told STAT:

"[Pfizer] is trying to eke out every bit much profit and minimize its gamble at every juncture with this vaccine development then this vaccine rollout. Now, the vaccine development has been heavily subsidized already. Then in that location's very minimal run a risk for the manufacturer involved at that place."

Signs of COVID vaccine failure, adverse effects rising

Pfizer continues to sign lucrative hole-and-corner vaccine deals across the globe. In June 2021, they signed i of their biggest contracts to engagement — with the Philippine government for 40 million doses .

Meanwhile, COVID-xix "breakthrough cases," which used to be called vaccine failures, are on the ascension. According to the U.South. Centers for Disease Command and Prevention (CDC), equally of July xix, 5,914 people who had been fully vaccinated for COVID-xix were hospitalized or died from COVID-19.

In the U.One thousand., every bit of July xv, 87.five% of the developed population had received ane dose of COVID-19 vaccine and 67.i% had received two. Yet, symptomatic cases among partially and fully vaccinated are on the rise , with an average of 15,537 new infections a twenty-four hours being detected, a twoscore% increase from the week earlier.

In a July 19 report from the CDC, the agency likewise reported that the Vaccine Adverse Effect Reporting Organisation (VAERS) had received 12,313 reports of death among people who received a COVID-xix vaccine — more than doubling from the 6,079 reports of decease from the week before.

Soon after the report, however, they reverted the number to the 6,079 from the calendar week before, indicating by default that no deaths from the vaccine had occurred that calendar week, raising serious questions about transparency and vaccine safety.

Many other adverse events are also actualization, ranging in risks from the biologically agile SARS-CoV-2 spike protein used in the vaccine to claret clots, reproductive toxicity and myocarditis ( heart inflammation ). As you lot can meet in the confidential indemnification agreements, however, even if the vaccine turns out to be a dismal failure — and a gamble to short- and long-term health — countries have no recourse, nor does anyone who received the experimental shots.

1 question that we should all be request is this: If the COVID-xix vaccines are, in fact, as safe and effective as the manufacturers claim, why do they require this level of indemnification?

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do non necessarily reflect the views of Children's Wellness Defense.